Omnistamp Start a project
Engineers comparing a formed part with its simulation

Design intent.
Process reality.

Forming simulation, DFM and die design for stamped parts: engineer the part and its manufacturing route together, from the first geometry review to the first measured part.

The problem

Where programs lose time.

Feasibility

Geometry that can’t be formed

Design intent outruns the material’s forming limit.

Timing

Late tooling changes

Feasibility issues surface after steel is cut.

Route

No feasible process

The part needs a forming sequence nobody has defined yet.

How we work

From geometry to a proven route.

Engineers reviewing a part and its forming route
Step 1 of 5

Define the route

Connect the blank or tube to the final part through a feasible sequence of operations.

Forming limit diagram and strain map from a forming simulation
Step 2 of 5

Simulate forming

Expose thinning, splits, wrinkles and springback before committing to tooling.

Die surface being refined
Step 3 of 5

Refine tooling

Develop die surfaces around material flow, restraint and springback compensation.

Robotic joining cell for formed parts
Step 4 of 5

Plan downstream

Define trimming, joining and fixturing around the formed part.

Portable measuring arm inspecting a part
Step 5 of 5

Measure

Compare physical parts with nominal geometry and the simulated result.

What you get

A route your tool shop can build.

Included services

Design for manufacturingProcess developmentDie designTechnical consulting

DFM review

Geometry, material and tolerance changes that make the part feasible.

Process sequence

Forming, trimming and joining steps defined for the part.

Tooling concept

Die design connected to the process, ready for build and tryout.

Simulation results

Formability and springback findings with recommended revisions.

Send the CAD. And the target.

The part, the drawing or the manufacturing challenge. We scope the development around the decisions your program needs to make.

Start a project